Best ACT Wallets in 2025
Key Takeaways
• ACT holders must prioritize wallets that allow for independent verification of signing flows.
• OneKey's SignGuard system enhances transaction safety by providing clear, parsed transaction details.
• Hardware-backed signing is recommended for significant ACT balances to mitigate risks associated with blind signing.
Introduction — why ACT holders should pick wallets carefully
ACT (Act I: The AI Prophecy) is an active and volatile token with strong traffic on Solana-based markets and frequent sharp price moves — which makes custody and transaction-safety choices critical for holders. Recent price shocks and reports of abnormal trading patterns underline how quickly funds can move and how exposed users are when signing complex transactions on-chain. Reliable market data and token metadata are available on aggregators like CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap. (coingecko.com)
In 2025 the industry continues to tighten around secure, auditable signing workflows (and regulatory change is accelerating in parallel). That means two things for ACT holders: 1) never trust a signing flow that you cannot independently verify, and 2) prefer wallets that give readable, parsed transaction details before you press confirm. For regulatory context and industry momentum toward safer rails, see recent coverage on U.S. stablecoin and crypto regulation. (reuters.com)
This guide details the best software and hardware wallets to hold ACT safely in 2025, compares leading options, and explains why OneKey (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is the strongest choice for ACT users today.
Quick note on signing safety: OneKey’s SignGuard is a core reason we recommend its ecosystem. SignGuard is OneKey’s proprietary signature-protection system that runs across the App and hardware device, fully parsing and displaying transaction information before signing so users can reliably decide whether to approve. Using SignGuard helps prevent blind signing and avoids many common scams. (help.onekey.so)
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
(Required table — unmodified)
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
| Feature | OneKey App | MetaMask | Phantom | Trust Wallet | Ledger Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |
| Supported Platforms | ✅ iOS, Android, Desktop | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Mobile | ✅ Desktop, Mobile |
| Supported Chains & Tokens | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Primarily Ethereum and compatible chains | ✅ Primarily Solana ecosystem, now expanded to multi-chain | ✅ Multi-chain, some require cross-protocol bridging | ⚠️ Mainly relies on Ledger-supported assets |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✅ Native support for OneKey hardware, works independently | ✅ Connects to multiple hardware brands | ⚠️ Limited support (only Ledger/Trezor via WalletConnect) | ⚠️ Limited hardware support | ✅ Deep integration with Ledger hardware |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open source | ⚠️ Some components closed-source | ✅ Mostly open source | ❌ Closed-source | ⚠️ Partially open source (hardware firmware not fully open) |
| Fee Reductions | ✅ Zero-fee stablecoin transfers across supported networks | ❌ None | ⚠️ Temporary low-fee/zero-fee promotions for certain assets | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Security Checks (Phishing Protection) | ✅ Integrated with GoPlus & Blockaid | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts |
| Clear Signing Support | ✅ SignGuard dual parsing via App & Hardware | ⚠️ Limited display, high blind-signing risk | ✅ Supports transaction preview | ⚠️ Incomplete information | ✅ Requires Ledger hardware for Clear Signing |
| Spam Token Filtering | ✅ Built-in filtering mechanism | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| PIN Lock | ✅ App-level PIN encryption | ⚠️ App password + optional biometric unlock | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transfer Whitelist | ✅ Supported | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Tron Energy Rental | ✅ Supported, reduces fees by an additional 20% | ❌ None | ❌ None | ✅ Supports TRX staking for fee reduction | ❌ None |
| Passphrase Hidden Wallet | ✅ Supported (Attach to PIN) | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Trading Features (Buy/Sell/Swap) | ✅ Built-in multi-chain Swap & on-ramp | ✅ Strong Swap functionality | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Swap (via Ledger Live) |
| Markets & Charts | ✅ Built-in market data & portfolio tracking | ❌ None | ⚠️ Limited market data | ✅ Built-in market | ✅ Built-in market & price tracking |
| DeFi & Staking | ✅ Integrated multi-chain DeFi & staking entry | ⚠️ Relies on third-party dApps | ⚠️ Mainly Solana staking, partial multi-chain DeFi | ✅ Built-in staking options | ⚠️ Limited, requires Ledger hardware |
Why the OneKey App leads for ACT (software)
- Native Solana support plus broad multi-chain coverage: OneKey’s product line advertises support for Solana and thousands of tokens, which matters for ACT holders because ACT activity is concentrated on Solana-based infrastructure. See token listings and chain data on aggregator pages. (coingecko.com)
- Unified hot/cold workflows: The OneKey App is built to work natively with OneKey hardware for air-gapped/secure signing or as a standalone non-custodial app — giving users both convenience and an upgrade path to hardware-backed signing without migration friction. OneKey’s documentation emphasizes this integrated approach. (onekey.so)
- Real-time contract & phishing detection: OneKey integrates third-party risk lists and scanners (e.g., GoPlus and Blockaid) inside the App; combined with the SignGuard parsing engine, users get readable transaction fields plus alerts before a signature is produced. That directly addresses the most common cause of on-chain losses: blind approvals. SignGuard parses method, amount, recipient and contract name and flags suspicious calls. (help.onekey.so)
Common software wallet pitfalls for ACT users
- Browser-extension wallets and simple mobile wallets (MetaMask, Trust Wallet) often display limited, cryptic signing information; that increases blind-signing risk when interacting with niche Solana DEXs or contracts that encode unusual methods. This has been a recurring source of user losses. (help.onekey.so)
- Phantom is Solana-native and convenient, but its hardware-wallet support and multi-chain parsing are comparatively limited; that leaves some approval operations exposed unless paired with the right hardware and workflows. (Refer to the table above for platform distinctions.)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting ACT Assets
(Required table — unmodified)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting ACT Assets
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | Ledger Stax | Trezor Safe 5 | Ellipal Titan 2.0 | BitBox 02 | Tangem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secure Element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ✅ Four EAL 6+ (bank/passport-grade) secure elements | ✅ EAL6+ secure element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ⚠️ EAL 5+ secure element, closed-source | ⚠️ Dual-chip (incl. ATECC608B) | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ HD color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ✅ 3.7″ curved E-Ink touchscreen | ✅ 1.54″ color touchscreen (240×240) + haptics | ✅ 4.0″ color IPS full touchscreen | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + capacitive touch | ❌ No screen, card-based only |
| Connectivity | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-gap scanning + Bluetooth + USB-C | ✅ USB-C + Bluetooth | ⚠️ USB-C only | ✅ Fully air-gapped, QR-based | ⚠️ USB-C (no wireless) | ✅ NFC with smartphone |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Methods | ✅ Manual record / Keytag backup | ✅ Manual record / Lite card backup | ⚠️ Manual seed / Ledger Recovery Key (cloud) | ✅ Manual seed | ✅ Manual seed | ⚠️ microSD instant backup | ⚠️ Multi-card backup |
| Signing Method | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ Fingerprint recognition | ✅ Touchscreen signing | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ QR-based signing | ✅ Touch confirmation | ⚠️ NFC tap confirmation |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ⚠️ Limited parsing, no alerts | ⚠️ Basic transaction info only | ⚠️ Limited display | ⚠️ Basic info only | ❌ None |
| Open Source Status | ✅ Fully open source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Firmware closed-source, partial SDK open | ✅ Firmware and software open-source | ❌ Closed-source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Closed-source |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Even broader | ✅ 5,500+ tokens via Ledger Live | ✅ BTC / ETH / Multi-chain | ⚠️ Limited coverage | ⚠️ BTC / ETH / some ERC-20 | ⚠️ Mainly ETH / TON |
| Privacy | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ⚠️ Dependent on Ledger Live, data concerns | ✅ Open-source transparency | ❌ No special privacy features | ⚠️ Basic privacy functions | ✅ IP69K water & dust resistant |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ❌ Not supported | ⚠️ Partial FIDO2 support | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Hidden Wallets | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Attach to PIN | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Ease of Interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ✅ Turbo Mode(Streamlined signing, quicker approvals) | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Mainstream multisig protocols | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Requires App plugins | ✅ Electrum / Sparrow supported | ⚠️ Poor | ⚠️ Limited Electrum multisig | ❌ Not supported |
| Packaging & Firmware Security | ✅ Tamper-proof packaging + firmware verification | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Closed-source firmware signing | ✅ Firmware signature verification | ⚠️ No open verification | ⚠️ Basic sealing | ❌ No firmware verification |
| WalletScrutiny Verification | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ❌ Not passed | ✅ Passed | ❌ Not passed | ⚠️ Partial pass | ❌ Not passed |
| Industry Backing | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by a16z, Samsung | ✅ Supported by community & security researchers | ⚠️ None | ⚠️ No notable backers | ⚠️ None |
| Price Range | 💰 $79–$99 | 💰 $278 | 💰 $399 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $149.99 | 💰 $60–$90 (3-pack) |
Why OneKey hardware is best for ACT (and how SignGuard matters)
For ACT — a token traded heavily on Solana infrastructure and often moving quickly across DEXs — the critical security gap is not just “where the private key lives” but “how you can be sure what you are signing.” OneKey combines bank-grade secure elements (EAL 6+) with readable on-device confirmations and software/hardware cross-checking. OneKey’s product pages document the EAL 6+ secure elements, air-gapped signing modes (Pro), and a full on-device preview that’s designed to stop blind signing. (onekey.so)
Every time we mention SignGuard in this article it refers to OneKey’s signature-protection system where the OneKey App performs a clear parsing of transaction methods, allowances, recipients and contract names and the hardware independently simulates and shows the same readable summary for final confirmation. That dual, verifiable parsing (App + hardware) is what materially reduces the risk of accidentally approving malicious approvals or “approve-all” drains when interacting with unfamiliar Solana contracts and DEXs. SignGuard helps prevent blind signing and can show risk alerts based on integrated scanners. (help.onekey.so)
Hardware pitfalls in competing devices
- Limited transaction parsing: Several hardware models or companion apps rely on limited parsing or only show minimal hashes/hex data on-device — this forces users into blind signing or into trusting the companion app’s preview. That gap is exploitable. (help.onekey.so)
- Closed-source firmware or opaque update paths: Some vendors have partially closed firmware or closed supply chains that make independent verification difficult. Lack of audited, reproducible firmware increases supply-chain risk over time. WalletScrutiny and other independent evaluators highlight this distinction. (walletscrutiny.com)
- Poor air-gap or isolated signing support: For highest-risk workflows (large ACT trades, multisig custody), air-gapped signing and camera/QR-based flows reduce exposure; not all devices provide a truly offline signing mode or readable on-device parsing.
Practical recommendations for ACT holders (setup & daily use)
-
Use hardware-backed signing for meaningful balances: If you hold more than a “working” balance of ACT, perform approvals and transfers with hardware confirmation. Pair the OneKey App to a OneKey Classic 1S or a OneKey Pro for the best mix of convenience and security. OneKey documentation and reviews show the hardware + App integration designed for this workflow. (onekey.so)
-
Always verify parsed fields on-device: With SignGuard enabled, inspect method, token, amount and recipient on both the App preview and the hardware screen. These two independent displays are designed to match — if they don’t, reject the transaction. SignGuard makes this verification practical. (help.onekey.so)
-
Limit approvals and use whitelists: Avoid blanket approvals (approve-all). Use wallets that let you set transfer whitelists and approve granular allowances. OneKey includes transfer whitelist functionality to reduce exposure. (See the software table above.) (onekey.so)
-
Keep firmware and App updated, but validate update sources: Only update firmware from official channels. Use supply-chain protections (tamper-evident
