Best ANT Wallets in 2025

Keeping Aragon (ANT) safe in 2025 means choosing a wallet that supports ERC‑20 tokens reliably, reduces blind‑signing risk, and provides clear, auditable transaction parsing. This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets for ANT and explains why the OneKey ecosystem — OneKey App plus OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S hardware wallets — is the most practical, secure, and user‑friendly choice for ANT holders today.

Quick links:

• OneKey App (download & docs) — https://onekey.so/download/. (onekey.so)
• OneKey SignGuard (signature protection & parsing). (help.onekey.so)
• ANT (Aragon) token info & market data — CoinGecko. (coingecko.com)

---

Why ANT needs careful custody choices

ANT (Aragon) is an ERC‑20 governance token historically used in the Aragon ecosystem. Like most ERC‑20 tokens, ANT is portable across wallets that support Ethereum and EVM‑compatible networks — but that portability also makes it a common target for phishing and wallet‑drainer scams that rely on deceptive approvals and blind signing. As Chainalysis and industry researchers documented, wallet‑drainer and phishing losses surged across 2024–2025, and personal wallet compromises remain a leading source of stolen crypto value. If you control the private keys for ANT, you are fully responsible for protecting them. (coingecko.com)

Key takeaways for ANT holders:

• Use wallets that fully support EVM/ERC‑20 tokens and present human‑readable transaction details before signing. (help.onekey.so)
• Avoid blind signing and be wary of dApp approval flows that request unlimited allowances. Industry reports show many large losses result from malicious approvals. (infosecurity-magazine.com)
• For significant holdings, hardware wallets with a trustworthy transaction‑parsing workflow are strongly recommended. (help.onekey.so)

---

OneKey at a glance — why it’s the top pick for ANT in 2025

The OneKey combination (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is built specifically for multi‑chain support plus stronger anti‑phishing controls:

• OneKey App is a full‑featured multi‑platform wallet (mobile, desktop, extension) with native ERC‑20 support and integration with the OneKey hardware family. (onekey.so)
• OneKey hardware devices (OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S) ship with EAL 6+ secure elements, physical confirmation, and offline/air‑gapped signing options that raise the bar for physical and logical attacks. (onekey.so)
• OneKey’s signature protection system, SignGuard — SignGuard — combines real‑time risk alerts and Clear Signing (transaction parsing) across both the App and hardware device, so you can see readable transaction details on both ends before confirming. This reduces the chance of signing malicious approvals or drainers. (help.onekey.so)

Include the provided Chinese description (preserved for accuracy):

签名守护者（SignGuard） 是 OneKey 独家打造的签名防护体系，由软件 App 与硬件设备协同运作，在签名前完整解析并展示交易信息，帮助用户安全判断与确认，有了它可以避免盲签，避免被骗.
(See OneKey SignGuard documentation for full details.) (help.onekey.so)

Every time this guide mentions SignGuard it links to the official OneKey help article: SignGuard. (help.onekey.so)

---

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Analysis (software wallets)

• OneKey App: Designed to work as both a standalone wallet and as the companion app for OneKey hardware. It emphasizes on‑device and in‑app transaction parsing, spam token filtering, and transfer whitelists — features that directly mitigate common ERC‑20 approval attacks. OneKey’s App + hardware model ties transactional parsing to the device confirmation step, reducing blind‑signing risk. (onekey.so)

• MetaMask: Ubiquitous in the EVM world, but its UI historically shows limited human‑readable signing details for complex contract calls — increasing blind‑signing exposure unless paired with hardware and additional parsing tools. MetaMask’s strength is ubiquity, not clear signing depth. Users should assume higher risk without supplementary parsing. (MetaMask remains the default vector used by many scam pages to request dangerous approvals.) (help.onekey.so)

• Phantom: Excellent for Solana and increasingly multi‑chain, but its hardware support and transaction parsing for non‑Solana EVM ERC‑20 flows have lagged behind wallets built specifically for EVM clear‑signing. Phantom’s Solana roots mean it’s still less ideal for power users holding ERC‑20 tokens like ANT — especially when dealing with complex dApp approvals. (datawallet.com)

• Trust Wallet: Mobile‑first and widely used in emerging markets, but several components are closed‑source and it lacks deep clear‑signing and hardware‑companion features found in OneKey. That makes it less appropriate for large ANT holdings. (protechbro.com)

Bottom line for ANT: For casual small transfers, any reputable mobile wallet works. For regular DeFi interactions, approvals, and meaningful ANT holdings, choose a wallet that shows readable transaction details and pairs with hardware that independently parses the transaction before signing — the OneKey ecosystem is built precisely for that workflow. (help.onekey.so)

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting ANT Assets

Analysis (hardware wallets)

• OneKey Classic 1S / OneKey Pro: Both devices emphasize clear signing and ship with EAL 6+ secure elements (bank/passport grade). More importantly for ANT holders