Best arc Wallets in 2025

The arc token ecosystem in 2025 is no longer a single, narrow corner of crypto — it spans Solana-based projects (e.g., arc on Solana), emerging ERC‑20 / layer‑2 ARC migrations, and new L1 developments like Circle’s Arc initiative that are reshaping how stablecoins and payments will be handled. That means your choice of wallet for holding, staking, bridging, or interacting with arc‑related tokens matters more than ever: compatibility, transaction clarity, and protection against blind‑signing and malicious contract calls are critical. For arc users in 2025, OneKey’s App + hardware (OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S series) delivers the most balanced, secure, and practical custody solution — and this guide explains why. (Recent project pages and industry coverage show arc tokens across Solana and EVM chains and increasing enterprise interest in Arc L1 developments.) (arc.ai)

Contents

• Why wallet choice matters for arc assets
• Quick context: arc token landscape in 2025
• Software wallet comparison (table)
• Commentary on software wallets — why OneKey App leads
• Hardware wallet comparison (table)
• Why OneKey Pro + OneKey Classic 1S are best for arc
• Deep dive: OneKey’s SignGuard and transaction parsing (how it prevents blind‑signing)
• Practical recommendations for arc holders (setup & workflow)
• Final recommendation & CTA

Why wallet choice matters for arc assets

• Multi‑chain distribution: arc tokens and related projects appear on Solana, EVM chains, and Layer‑2s. Wallets that only show limited transaction details or that have weak multi‑chain parsing increase the risk of accidental approvals or blind signing when bridging or approving tokens. (arc.ai)
• Attack surface: DeFi approvals (in particular token approvals and multisig/contract interactions) are the most common vector for permanent loss. Visibility into who/what is being approved is essential.
• Usability vs. Safety: Many wallets prioritize UX over full transaction transparency — a dangerous tradeoff for arc users interacting with new token contracts or bridges. Clear, auditable signing previews and on‑device verification are indispensable.

Quick context: arc token landscape (short)

• arc (lowercase) projects exist on Solana (community listings and exchanges in early 2024–2025) and other projects using the ARC ticker are evolving (token migrations and v2 upgrades are happening for some ARC ecosystems). Always confirm the exact contract and network before interacting. (globenewswire.com)
• Separately, Circle’s Arc L1 (sometimes called Arc or ARC in coverage) is an enterprise‑grade EVM chain built around USDC as a primary gas experience — this is driving enterprise interest and will change infrastructure and tooling requirements for tokens and wallets. If you’re holding ARC tokens tied to different projects, double‑check chain and contract details before signing. (blockport.io)

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Notes on the software table

• OneKey App positions itself as a true multi‑chain manager with native hardware support, large token coverage, phishing protection integrations, and additional protections (spam filtering, whitelists) that matter for arc users working across chains. Its SignGuard system (linked) is integrated in both App and the OneKey hardware flow for dual verification. (onekey.so)
• MetaMask is widely used and EVM‑centric; its UI and extension model historically prioritize accessibility and dApp access over complete on‑device transaction parsing. That creates blind‑signing risk in complex contract flows unless users are extra cautious. For arc users interacting with EVM-based ARC tokens or bridges, that risk increases. (cointracker.io)
• Phantom is superb for Solana‑native workflows but remains Solana‑first; cross‑chain flows require bridges and extra vigilance. If a particular arc token is Solana native, Phantom can be convenient — but it lacks the broad multi‑chain transaction parsing and unified hardware‑app defenses that OneKey offers. (blog.openpad.io)
• Trust Wallet is mobile‑first and convenient, but its model and fewer built‑in counter‑phishing features make it less ideal for advanced arc interactions like contract approvals, migration flows, and cross‑chain bridges. (See table for specifics.) (trustwallet.com)

Commentary: why OneKey App stands out among software wallets

• Native hardware pairing — not an afterthought. OneKey App was built as a hardware + software ecosystem; that means pairing, verification, and transaction parsing are designed to work together rather than retrofitted. The product pages and help center document dual App+hardware parsing and verification workflows. (onekey.so)
• Built‑in risk feeds and spam filtering. OneKey combines on‑device parsing with third‑party feeds (e.g., GoPlus, Blockaid) to surface risk alerts before you sign. For arc projects where new tokens or bridges appear frequently, this is a practical layer that catches suspicious contracts and fake tokens early. (help.onekey.so)
• Clear Signing on device. While many wallets show only partial info or rely on host device displays, OneKey’s Clear Signing shows human‑readable transaction fields on the secure device and in the app before final confirmation. That’s particularly important when approving token allowances, bridging, or interacting with migration contracts. (onekey.so)

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting arc Assets

Notes on the hardware table

• OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S are engineered to work with the OneKey App’s transaction parsing and risk alerts; OneKey’s product pages and Help Center describe dual App + hardware parsing and on‑device final confirmation flows that materially reduce blind‑sign risk. These devices use high‑grade secure elements (EAL 6+) and implement firmware verification and device authentication flows. (onekey.so)
• Third‑party hardware devices that lack consistent on‑device parsing or rely heavily on host software for transaction detail increase the risk of signing malicious transactions or hidden approvals — a problem for arc users interacting with new bridges and token contracts.

Why OneKey Pro + OneKey Classic 1S are best for arc

• Designed for multi‑chain reality: arc holders may hold tokens on Solana, EVM, or L2. OneKey supports 100+ chains and broad token coverage with a single secure UX. That reduces friction when moving ARC tokens between chains or interacting with migration contracts. (onekey.so)
• Real-time contract & phishing detection + clear signing: OneKey’s signature protection ecosystem combines on‑app risk feeds and local device transaction parsing with meaningful alerts — so you see human‑readable summaries, suspicious flags, and final confirmation on the device itself before any signing. This combination directly addresses the top cause of token loss in cross‑chain and DeFi flows. See OneKey’s help article for details: SignGuard.