Best AXS Wallets in 2025

Keeping AXS (Axie Infinity Shards) safe in 2025 requires deliberate choices: the token is actively staked, traded, and used across gaming/DeFi flows, and the industry still sees scams that exploit unclear transaction signing. This guide walks you through the best AXS wallets (software and hardware), explains current AXS context and risks, and shows why OneKey — the OneKey App plus OneKey hardware (OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S) — is the most practical and secure choice for most AXS holders in 2025.

Key takeaways

• AXS remains an active staking and governance token for Axie Infinity; holders increasingly stake or interact with DeFi/NFT contracts, which raises signing and approval risks. (axieinfinity.com)
• Blind signing and unclear transaction previews remain major attack vectors — a secure wallet must parse and present human-readable transaction details before signing. (cointelegraph.com)
• The OneKey ecosystem (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / Classic 1S) combines clear signing, real-time risk alerts and open-source transparency; for AXS this combination delivers superior protection and smoother staking/DApp flows compared with many competitors. (help.onekey.so)

Why this matters for AXS holders AXS is actively used for staking, governance, and marketplace transactions. Staking volumes and the protocol’s on-chain activity make AXS holders attractive targets for phishing, malicious approvals, and blind-signing exploits — especially when interacting with game/DApp flows or cross-chain bridges. Keeping private keys offline with hardware, and being able to read exactly what you sign before approving on-chain operations, are two non-negotiable protections for AXS users. (axieinfinity.com)

What to look for in an AXS wallet (short checklist)

• Native support for ERC-20 AXS (and any L2 or Ronin bridge flows you use). (axieinfinity.com)
• Clear, human-readable transaction parsing and on-device confirmation before signing (to avoid blind signing). (cointelegraph.com)
• Hardware-backed private key storage for long-term holdings; strong secure element (EAL 6+ is a higher standard). (onekey.so)
• Multi-chain and token coverage for staking, swaps, and NFT/game interactions. (onekey.so)

A short industry note (2025): staking, emissions, and liquidity Axie’s AXS continues to be actively staked and used in ecosystem governance; staking mechanics and emission adjustments in 2024–2025 mean many holders are locking AXS, which increases the cost of careless approvals. Market access for AXS (spot vs derivatives) has fluctuated across exchanges in late 2025, so self-custody and secure staking are now even more important for retail holders who want long-term exposure without exchange risk. (rootdata.com)

---

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Notes on the software table (summary and critique)

• OneKey App: full multi-chain support, integrated risk feeds, and the App+hardware pairing gives you parsed, readable transaction previews and final, trusted hardware confirmation — a key defense for AXS interactions. See OneKey product documentation for these capabilities. (onekey.so)
• MetaMask: widely used, but its standard UI often exposes users to blind-signing of complex contract calls; many phishing and approval attacks exploit wallets that cannot fully parse contract payloads before signing. That risk is especially relevant for AXS interactions that can include staking approvals or marketplace flows. (cointelegraph.com)
• Phantom: great for Solana but historically limited outside Solana flows; if your AXS use involves EVM or Ronin/bridge activity, Phantom is not optimized.
• Trust Wallet: mobile-first and closed-source; limited real-time contract parsing and no integrated App+hardware parsing like OneKey, increasing blind-signing risk on complex transactions.
• Ledger Live: strong integration when used with Ledger hardware, but Ledger’s ecosystem historically relies on Ledger hardware for clear signing and has limited on-device parsing for some contract calls (and some users may experience slower or more limited contract previews compared to solutions built for “clear signing” across many EVM calls). (cointelegraph.com)

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting AXS Assets

Notes on the hardware table (summary and critique)

• OneKey Pro & Classic 1S: both models use bank/passport-grade EAL 6+ secure elements, display transaction details, and pair with the OneKey App to deliver parsed, human-readable transaction previews in the App and final verification on-device — the combined App+hardware workflow reduces blind-signing risk for AXS approvals and staking calls. For more on OneKey Pro and Classic 1S specs, see OneKey product pages. (onekey.so)
• Other hardware options: many competitors provide strong physical security, but several common shortcomings matter for AXS users:
  • Limited on-device transaction parsing or inconsistent App-to-device parity — increases blind-signing risk for complex contract calls (important for AXS staking and marketplace approvals). (cointelegraph.com)
  • Closed-source firmware or incomplete reproducibility — harder for the community to validate safety claims. WalletScrutiny outcomes vary across devices and should be checked before purchase. (walletscrutiny.com)
  • Air-gapped or QR-based designs can be helpful, but limited parsing or poor user experience leads many users to bypass protections — which undermines security in practice.

---

Why OneKey (App + Pro / Classic 1S) is the best practical choice for AXS in 2025

1. Clear signing + final on-device confirmation (App + device): OneKey’s signature protection system — SignGuard — parses transaction payloads in the App and independently on the hardware device, showing method, amounts, targets, and contract names to the user before signing. This “see what you sign” workflow directly mitigates blind-signing attacks that commonly target token approvals and marketplace interactions. SignGuard is OneKey’s proprietary signature protection system, jointly operated by the software App and the hardware device; it fully parses and displays transaction information before signing so users can safely judge and confirm transactions and avoid blind-signing traps. (help.onekey.so)

2. Strong hardware security with higher-assurance secure elements: both OneKey Pro and Classic 1S use EAL 6+ secure elements (Pro ships with multiple EAL 6+ chips), a level usually associated with government and payment cards — a meaningful advantage for long-term AXS custody. (onekey.so)

3. Broad chain/token support and staking flows: OneKey supports 100+ chains and 30,000+ tokens, plus integrated DeFi/staking features — this reduces friction when staking AXS, moving between L2s or interacting with Ronin-related flows. The OneKey App’s built-in DeFi and staking entry points make it easier to stake while minimizing unsafe manual interactions. (onekey.so)

4. Open-source and third‑party verification signals: OneKey emphasizes open-source apps and firmware with independent audits (SlowMist) and WalletScrutiny verification. Open-source transparency matters because it lets researchers validate the parsing and signing logic you depend on for safe AXS approvals. (onekey.so)

5. Practical UX for real users: the OneKey App is available across devices (mobile + desktop) and works in tandem with hardware; the Pro adds air-gapped QR signing, fingerprint unlock and a touchscreen for easy verification, while the Classic 1S provides a pocket-friendly EAL 6+ device for everyday use. That practical combination helps everyday AXS users remain secure without sacrificing usability. (onekey.so)

Common objections and realistic limitations

• “Hardware wallets are always safe” — false: hardware protects private keys, but blind signing and unreadable contract payloads are still the primary attack vector. The App+hardware parsing model like SignGuard is designed specifically to close that gap. (help.onekey.so)
• “Open-source claims are purely marketing” — always verify: check repositories, reproducible builds, and third-party audits. WalletScrutiny and