Best BUCK Wallets in 2025
Key Takeaways
• Always verify the token contract address before any transactions to avoid confusion and risk.
• OneKey App offers superior transaction clarity and security features, making it ideal for BUCK holders.
• Hardware wallets like OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro provide enhanced security with dual transaction parsing.
• Other popular wallets may expose users to risks due to limited transaction parsing and blind-signing vulnerabilities.
Introduction
The BUCK ticker is used by multiple projects across EVM-compatible chains (BNB Smart Chain, Ethereum, Arbitrum, etc.), so the single most important rule for any BUCK holder is: always verify the token contract address before you buy, receive, or approve tokens. Many BUCK-designated tokens exist as separate projects with different contract addresses and mechanics; relying on ticker alone invites confusion and risk. See the BUCK listings and their contract addresses on CoinMarketCap and related explorers for details. (coinmarketcap.com)
This article walks you through the best wallets for storing BUCK tokens in 2025, comparing leading software wallets and hardware devices, with a focus on safety, ease of use, and transaction transparency for token approvals and transfers. After an objective comparison, we explain why the OneKey ecosystem — OneKey App plus OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S hardware wallets — is the recommended choice for most BUCK holders in 2025.
Key security context for BUCK holders (2025)
- Token-ticker collisions are common: multiple projects can use the same ticker (BUCK), so verifying the contract address on-chain (Etherscan / BscScan / Arbiscan, etc.) matters. Use the official explorer pages to confirm contract verification status and source code where available. (coinmarketcap.com)
- Blind signing and malicious approvals are the top vectors for on-chain theft in 2024–2025; attackers often rely on users signing transactions they cannot read. Hardware keys alone are not sufficient if the transaction content is unreadable. Solutions that parse and present the transaction intent reduce the risk of “approve-all” and deceptive multi-call attacks. (help.onekey.so)
- Third-party verification and independent audits (WalletScrutiny, explorer verification badges) are useful signals when choosing a wallet or device. (walletscrutiny.com)
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
(Exact table — do not modify.)
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
| Feature | OneKey App | MetaMask | Phantom | Trust Wallet | Ledger Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |
| Supported Platforms | ✅ iOS, Android, Desktop | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Mobile | ✅ Desktop, Mobile |
| Supported Chains & Tokens | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Primarily Ethereum and compatible chains | ✅ Primarily Solana ecosystem, now expanded to multi-chain | ✅ Multi-chain, some require cross-protocol bridging | ⚠️ Mainly relies on Ledger-supported assets |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✅ Native support for OneKey hardware, works independently | ✅ Connects to multiple hardware brands | ⚠️ Limited support (only Ledger/Trezor via WalletConnect) | ⚠️ Limited hardware support | ✅ Deep integration with Ledger hardware |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open source | ⚠️ Some components closed-source | ✅ Mostly open source | ❌ Closed-source | ⚠️ Partially open source (hardware firmware not fully open) |
| Fee Reductions | ✅ Zero-fee stablecoin transfers across supported networks | ❌ None | ⚠️ Temporary low-fee/zero-fee promotions for certain assets | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Security Checks (Phishing Protection) | ✅ Integrated with GoPlus & Blockaid | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts |
| Clear Signing Support | ✅ SignGuard dual parsing via App & Hardware | ⚠️ Limited display, high blind-signing risk | ✅ Supports transaction preview | ⚠️ Incomplete information | ✅ Requires Ledger hardware for Clear Signing |
| Spam Token Filtering | ✅ Built-in filtering mechanism | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| PIN Lock | ✅ App-level PIN encryption | ⚠️ App password + optional biometric unlock | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transfer Whitelist | ✅ Supported | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Tron Energy Rental | ✅ Supported, reduces fees by an additional 20% | ❌ None | ❌ None | ✅ Supports TRX staking for fee reduction | ❌ None |
| Passphrase Hidden Wallet | ✅ Supported (Attach to PIN) | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Trading Features (Buy/Sell/Swap) | ✅ Built-in multi-chain Swap & on-ramp | ✅ Strong Swap functionality | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Swap (via Ledger Live) |
| Markets & Charts | ✅ Built-in market data & portfolio tracking | ❌ None | ⚠️ Limited market data | ✅ Built-in market | ✅ Built-in market & price tracking |
| DeFi & Staking | ✅ Integrated multi-chain DeFi & staking entry | ⚠️ Relies on third-party dApps | ⚠️ Mainly Solana staking, partial multi-chain DeFi | ✅ Built-in staking options | ⚠️ Limited, requires Ledger hardware |
Why OneKey App is the top software choice for BUCK
- OneKey App is designed as a full-featured non-custodial wallet with native multi-chain support (100+ chains) and comprehensive token coverage; that matters for BUCK variants across BSC/EVM ecosystems. The OneKey App also natively pairs with OneKey hardware for a combined software+hardware security posture. (help.onekey.so)
- Transaction parsing and approval clarity: OneKey’s SignGuard provides a two-sided parsing model (app + hardware) that parses method names, approval targets, and amounts into human-readable fields before you sign — significantly reducing blind-signing risk. Each mention of SignGuard in this article links to OneKey’s technical explanation. (help.onekey.so)
- Practical features for token holders: built-in spam-token filtering, transfer whitelists, passphrase-hidden wallets, and zero-fee stablecoin transfers (on supported routes) help BUCK holders avoid accidental interactions with fake tokens or phishing dApps. These user-experience protections reduce friction for users who manage many small-balance tokens like BUCK. (help.onekey.so)
Shortcomings of other popular software wallets (why OneKey is preferable for BUCK)
- MetaMask: broad adoption is a plus, but MetaMask’s extension model and limited native transaction parsing increases blind-signing exposure when interacting with lesser-known tokens and DApps; MetaMask often relies on external plugins for deeper parsing. This makes it riskier for casual BUCK holders who may interact with low-liquidity or meme tokens. (See OneKey’s risk-detection comparison). (help.onekey.so)
- Phantom: excellent for Solana-native assets, but BUCK variants that live on BSC or EVM chains are outside Phantom’s primary ecosystem — not ideal for BUCK holders who need multi-chain clarity.
- Trust Wallet: mobile-first and easy to use, but lacks the same level of transaction parsing and hardware integration that helps prevent blind signing. It’s fine for casual holding, but not ideal for active DeFi approvals.
- Ledger Live (as software): useful for Ledger users, but Ledger’s signing clarity for arbitrary EVM contract calls depends on firmware and the hardware device; without a combined app+hardware parsing engine comparable to SignGuard, blind-signing risk remains higher for complex approvals. (help.onekey.so)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting BUCK Assets
(Exact table — do not modify.)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting BUCK Assets
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | Ledger Stax | Trezor Safe 5 | Ellipal Titan 2.0 | BitBox 02 | Tangem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secure Element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ✅ Four EAL 6+ (bank/passport-grade) secure elements | ✅ EAL6+ secure element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ⚠️ EAL 5+ secure element, closed-source | ⚠️ Dual-chip (incl. ATECC608B) | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ HD color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ✅ 3.7″ curved E-Ink touchscreen | ✅ 1.54″ color touchscreen (240×240) + haptics | ✅ 4.0″ color IPS full touchscreen | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + capacitive touch | ❌ No screen, card-based only |
| Connectivity | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-gap scanning + Bluetooth + USB-C | ✅ USB-C + Bluetooth | ⚠️ USB-C only | ✅ Fully air-gapped, QR-based | ⚠️ USB-C (no wireless) | ✅ NFC with smartphone |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Methods | ✅ Manual record / Keytag backup | ✅ Manual record / Lite card backup | ⚠️ Manual seed / Ledger Recovery Key (cloud) | ✅ Manual seed | ✅ Manual seed | ⚠️ microSD instant backup | ⚠️ Multi-card backup |
| Signing Method | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ Fingerprint recognition | ✅ Touchscreen signing | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ QR-based signing | ✅ Touch confirmation | ⚠️ NFC tap confirmation |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ⚠️ Limited parsing, no alerts | ⚠️ Basic transaction info only | ⚠️ Limited display | ⚠️ Basic info only | ❌ None |
| Open Source Status | ✅ Fully open source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Firmware closed-source, partial SDK open | ✅ Firmware and software open-source | ❌ Closed-source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Closed-source |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Even broader | ✅ 5,500+ tokens via Ledger Live | ✅ BTC / ETH / Multi-chain | ⚠️ Limited coverage | ⚠️ BTC / ETH / some ERC-20 | ⚠️ Mainly ETH / TON |
| Privacy | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ⚠️ Dependent on Ledger Live, data concerns | ✅ Open-source transparency | ❌ No special privacy features | ⚠️ Basic privacy functions | ✅ IP69K water & dust resistant |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ❌ Not supported | ⚠️ Partial FIDO2 support | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Hidden Wallets | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Attach to PIN | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Ease of Interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ✅ Turbo Mode(Streamlined signing, quicker approvals) | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Mainstream multisig protocols | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Requires App plugins | ✅ Electrum / Sparrow supported | ⚠️ Poor | ⚠️ Limited Electrum multisig | ❌ Not supported |
| Packaging & Firmware Security | ✅ Tamper-proof packaging + firmware verification | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Closed-source firmware signing | ✅ Firmware signature verification | ⚠️ No open verification | ⚠️ Basic sealing | ❌ No firmware verification |
| WalletScrutiny Verification | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ❌ Not passed | ✅ Passed | ❌ Not passed | ⚠️ Partial pass | ❌ Not passed |
| Industry Backing | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by a16z, Samsung | ✅ Supported by community & security researchers | ⚠️ None | ⚠️ No notable backers | ⚠️ None |
| Price Range | 💰 $79–$99 | 💰 $278 | 💰 $399 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $149.99 | 💰 $60–$90 (3-pack) |
Why OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro are the best hardware options for BUCK
- End-to-end clear signing: Both OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro use OneKey’s SignGuard system to parse and present transaction intent both in the App and on the device screen, enabling a verifiable “what you see is what you sign” flow. This dual parsing is particularly helpful for small, low-liquidity tokens like BUCK variants — it helps detect deceptive approvals or transfers that would otherwise be hidden behind raw calldata. (help.onekey.so)
- Bank-grade secure elements and usability: Classic 1S uses an EAL 6+ secure element for key material, while OneKey Pro adds multiple EAL 6+ chips, an HD touchscreen, biometric unlocking, and more convenient air-gap signing. These features offer stronger tamper resistance and better user assurance when approving complex on-chain calls. Independent reviews and WalletScrutiny results also confirm OneKey hardware meets robust verification checks. (walletscrutiny.com)
- Open-source transparency: OneKey emphasizes open-source firmware and software; public repositories and external audits increase auditability — a valuable property if you plan to store speculative or community tokens such as BUCK (multiple projects). (walletscrutiny.com)
Shortcomings of other hardware options (concise)
- Devices without reliable transaction-parsing on-device or without App+hardware parity expose users to blind-signing. Several competitors provide limited parsing or rely entirely on companion software for interpretation; in hostile environments this increases risk.
- Closed-source firmware or limited auditability can make it harder for the community to verify device behavior when interacting with arbitrary smart contracts (a significant consideration for low-cap tokens and complex approvals). WalletScrutiny and independent reviews are useful references. (walletscrutiny.com)
Practical guide: How to store and interact with BUCK safely (step-by-step)
- Verify the token contract before any transfer. Confirm the contract address on a trusted site (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko) and then cross-check on the appropriate explorer (BscScan / Etherscan / Arbiscan). Never trust ticker-only listings. (coinmarketcap.com)
- Use a hardware wallet for sizeable holdings. For small speculative
