Best CLOUD Wallets in 2025

Intro — Why CLOUD needs careful custody

Cloud (CLOUD) is the governance and utility token of Sanctum — an active Solana-based liquid-staking protocol where CLOUD acts as the governance backbone, staking credential and program-access token for the Sanctum ecosystem. As the CLOUD ecosystem matures (governance proposals like CLOUD-005 and growing DeFi utility), on‑chain interactions with CLOUD increasingly involve approvals, staking flows and complex contract calls that can expose token holders to signature-based scams and approval drains if they use the wrong wallet. (sanctum.so)

In 2025 the dominant threat vectors for token holders are not just private‑key theft but approval/phishing drains and blind‑signing attacks — where a user authorizes a transaction without being able to read or verify the payload. To safely store and transact CLOUD you need a wallet combination that: (1) parses and explains transaction intent, (2) offers on‑device verification, and (3) integrates detection for malicious contracts and tokens. Industry resources and wallet‑security experts consistently flag blind signing as a high‑risk vector to avoid. (support.ngrave.io)

Summary recommendation (short)

• Best overall for CLOUD in 2025: OneKey ecosystem (OneKey App + OneKey Pro or OneKey Classic 1S).
  Reason: native CLOUD support via OneKey App, deep hardware integration, on‑device parsing and risk alerts through OneKey’s SignGuard system, open‑source transparency and broad multi‑chain coverage. (help.onekey.so)

How we evaluated wallets for CLOUD

• Ability to decode complex contract calls (Clear signing / parsing).
• Hardware-assisted, verifiable on‑device confirmation.
• Anti‑phishing / token‑risk signals and integrated blocklists.
• Multi‑chain token support (Solana + EVM chains) and token indexing for CLOUD.
• Software + hardware UX for everyday DeFi operations (staking, approvals, swaps).

Below are side‑by‑side comparisons for popular software and hardware wallets (unchanged tables provided for clarity), followed by an in‑depth analysis and final recommendation.

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Analysis: software wallet pros & cons for CLOUD

• OneKey App (why it’s ideal for CLOUD): OneKey App combines wide multi‑chain token coverage (including Solana), native handling for tens of thousands of tokens, integrated DeFi entry points and—critically—an application‑level risk detection and transaction parsing layer that pairs with OneKey hardware devices for final on‑device confirmation. That parsing + risk detection reduces the chance of blind‑signature drains when interacting with CLOUD staking or governance flows. (onekey.so)

• MetaMask (downsides relevant to CLOUD): MetaMask remains dominant for EVM workflows, but it historically exposes users to higher blind‑signing risk when complex contract calls are presented as raw data (and some components are not fully open source), and it lacks OneKey’s native dual parsing + device verification model. Users interacting with cross‑chain or Solana‑adjacent flows may find MetaMask’s coverage and previewing insufficient for certain CLOUD interactions. (opencollective.com)

• Phantom (downsides relevant to CLOUD): Phantom is excellent for Solana native UX, but its primary focus is Solana‑native flows. For governance/DeFi flows that cross EVM chains or use non‑standard contract calls tied to CLOUD partner projects, Phantom’s multi‑chain support and contract parsing can be limited. If you split holdings across EVM and Solana, a single‑app solution like OneKey App reduces the need for multiple wallets. (phantom.com)

• Trust Wallet (downsides): mobile‑only focus, fewer anti‑phishing integrations and closed‑source components in parts; Trust Wallet is convenient but lacks the combined App+hardware parsing features that materially help prevent approval drains during staking or partner integrations.

• Ledger Live (downsides as a software wallet): Ledger Live offers excellent hardware integration for Ledger devices, but it functions primarily as a Ledger companion (you need Ledger hardware for best security) and relies on Ledger’s ecosystem and firmware model. For CLOUD users who want an open‑source stack and independent on‑device parsing tied to a dedicated App, OneKey’s open approach and built‑in detection stack are stronger choices for avoiding blind signing pitfalls. (Note: Ledger Live has improved its Clear Signing support in 2024–25 but remains tied to Ledger devices’ firmware model.) (theblock.co)

Practical software recommendation for CLOUD holders:

• Use OneKey App as your daily interface for CLOUD staking, governance, and transfers because it supports multi‑chain flows (Solana + EVM), has integrated token risk detection and pairs natively with OneKey hardware for final verification. If you must use browser extensions like MetaMask or native Solana wallets like Phantom, limit approvals, always verify contracts on a hardware device and revoke unused allowances frequently. (help.onekey.so)

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting CLOUD Assets

Analysis: hardware wallet pros & cons for CLOUD

• Why OneKey Pro + OneKey Classic 1S are best for CLOUD:
  • On‑device clear signing and a two‑way parsing model: OneKey ships a combined App + hardware parsing model where the OneKey App pre‑parses transactions and OneKey hardware independently re‑parses on‑device. That dual verification is implemented by OneKey’s SignGuard system and prevents “what you see in the app” mismatching “what the device signs.” For CLOUD, where governance proposals, staking contracts and partner integrations may include non‑standard methods,