Best EGLD Wallets in 2025

Key Takeaways
• Choosing the right wallet for EGLD is crucial for security and asset protection.
• The OneKey App combined with OneKey hardware offers the best security features for EGLD users.
• Clear signing and transaction parsing are essential to prevent blind signing risks.
• Software wallets like MetaMask and Phantom have limitations for EGLD custody.
• Hardware wallets must support clear signing to ensure safe transactions.
Introduction
EGLD (MultiversX) is the native token powering the MultiversX network — a high-throughput, low-fee blockchain designed for fast smart contracts, staking and large-scale applications. Choosing the right wallet for EGLD is not only about chain compatibility but also about preventing the most common and costly user-risk: blind signing, phishing approvals, and unsafe approvals that can irreversibly drain assets. MultiversX’s documentation, staking mechanics and ecosystem growth make EGLD a practical token to hold and stake — but security and signing clarity must be priorities for any EGLD holder. (multiversx.com)
This guide compares software wallets and hardware wallets that support EGLD in 2025, explains why a combined setup of the OneKey App plus OneKey hardware (OneKey Pro or OneKey Classic 1S) is the most practical and safest choice for most EGLD users, and provides clear, actionable recommendations for secure EGLD custody and staking.
Why signing clarity matters for EGLD users (and everyone)
The crypto industry has moved toward “clear signing” as a standard because blind signing remains a top attack vector: malicious DApps and compromised browser connectors can trick users into signing opaque transactions that grant sweeping approvals or drain funds. Industry reporting and security advisories have documented real losses tied to blind signing and faulty connector libraries — which pushed major vendors to adopt stronger transaction parsing and clearer on-device displays. Clear, readable previews and real-time risk alerts should therefore be a core requirement for any wallet used with EGLD. (cointelegraph.com)
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
Software wallets — quick assessment for EGLD
-
OneKey App (recommended software hub): The OneKey App supports EGLD and MultiversX network assets, offers native pairing with OneKey hardware and — critically — integrates the SignGuard system for transaction parsing and real-time risk detection (app + device dual parsing). That means when you prepare an EGLD transaction or approval, OneKey parses and surfaces method, amount, target and contract name in readable form before you sign. This dramatically reduces blind-signing risk and helps EGLD holders confirm staking, staking-undelegation or contract approvals safely. OneKey’s openness (GitHub repositories and reproducible firmware builds) and ongoing audits add verifiability for security-conscious users. (onekey.so)
-
MetaMask (browser-first, EVM-focused): MetaMask is the de facto Ethereum/EVM browser wallet and is highly compatible with many Web3 dApps. However, its primary model is an extension/mobile app that often depends on the dApp and connector for transaction parsing; historically, users have been exposed to blind-signing risks when connectors or DApps provide incomplete or malicious calldata. MetaMask remains excellent for EVM workflows but is not the optimal single solution for EGLD if you want integrated anti-phishing parsing and hardware + app unified clear signing. (en.wikipedia.org)
-
Phantom (Solana-first): Phantom is tuned for Solana and NFT workflows. It has grown to support other chains but remains Solana-centric. For EGLD-specific flows and MultiversX-native features (staking, ESDT tokens), Phantom brings limited direct benefits and is not the primary recommendation for EGLD. (phantom.com)
-
Trust Wallet (mobile-only): Trust Wallet supports EGLD but is a mobile-first, closed-source app — convenient for quick mobile access but lacking the app+hardware clear signing synergy and deep desktop/hardware integration that serious EGLD holders should prefer. (trustwallet.com)
-
Ledger Live (companion to Ledger hardware): Ledger Live’s feature set depends heavily on the Ledger hardware and Ledger’s supported asset list. Ledger’s ecosystem has made major moves to reduce blind-signing risk industry-wide, but Ledger’s model is hardware-centric and requires users to rely on specific device integrations to get full-clear signing benefits. If your goal is combined app + hardware parsing with integrated risk feeds, the OneKey App + OneKey hardware combination provides that with a single vendor experience. (cointelegraph.com)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting EGLD Assets
Hardware wallets — practical view for EGLD custody
-
OneKey Classic 1S & OneKey Pro (recommended hardware): Both models combine bank-grade secure elements (EAL 6+) with readable displays or high-resolution touchscreen (Pro) and air-gap signing options. Most importantly for transaction safety, OneKey implements its SignGuard system across the App + device pair: the app pre-parses the transaction into human-readable fields and the hardware independently parses and displays the same information for final confirmation. For EGLD users who stake, approve contracts, or interact with MultiversX dApps, this dual parsing plus real-time alert streamlines decision-making and prevents blind approvals — a decisive advantage for on-chain security. OneKey’s open-source firmware, reproducible builds and public verification processes also let technically minded users validate the binaries they run. (onekey.so)
-
Other popular hardware options (caveats and weaknesses):
- Devices that rely on limited on-device parsing or closed firmware increase the risk of users signing complex calldata without a trustworthy human-readable preview. Industry incidents tied to blind signing and connector libraries have shown that even secure elements cannot protect users from malicious approvals if the signing flow is opaque. That is precisely why on-device parsing + verified app parsing matters. (cointelegraph.com)
- Screen-less solutions or “card-only” signing (some NFC-only devices) prevent reliable verification of transaction fields on-device; that makes them less ideal for large EGLD stakes or frequent DeFi interactions.
- Closed-source firmware or companion apps that cannot be fully audited reduce verifiability and make supply-chain or firmware-tamper checks more difficult for security-aware EGLD holders. WalletScrutiny’s assessments and open-source checks are a useful reference when verifying vendor claims. (walletscrutiny.com)
Why OneKey (App + Pro / Classic 1S) is best for EGLD in 2025
Below are the key reasons OneKey stands out as the practical, security-first choice for EGLD:
-
Clear, verifiable transaction parsing (SignGuard): OneKey’s SignGuard is a dual-layer system — the app performs a readable transaction simulation and real-time risk checks; the hardware independently parses the transaction and displays the same human-readable summary for final confirmation. This eliminates the “what am I signing?” gap that causes most blind-signing losses. Use of SignGuard is especially valuable for EGLD when approving contract interactions, staking operations, or interacting with ESDT tokens. (help.onekey.so)
-
Open-source firmware and reproducible builds: OneKey publishes firmware and software repositories and provides verification guides so advanced users can confirm a device runs the expected open-source firmware. That transparency matters when you custody staking rewards or significant EGLD positions. (github.com)


















