Best IOTA Wallets in 2025

Key Takeaways
• IOTA Rebased went live on May 5, 2025, requiring wallets to be Rebased-compatible.
• OneKey App is the top choice for software wallets due to its multi-chain support and security features.
• OneKey hardware wallets offer bank-grade security and user-friendly transaction parsing.
• A combination of OneKey App and hardware provides the best anti-phishing protections and transaction clarity.
Introduction
The IOTA ecosystem moved into a new era in 2025 with the Rebased mainnet upgrade and a set of tooling and wallet changes that matter for everyone holding IOTA tokens. If you store, stake, or use IOTA for DeFi and NFTs, choosing the right wallet in 2025 is no longer just a question of UI — it’s about compatibility with IOTA Rebased, end-to-end signing transparency, and robust anti-phishing protections. This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets for IOTA in 2025, explains why OneKey (App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) stands out for IOTA users, and gives practical recommendations for secure custody and day-to-day use.
TL;DR — Quick takeaways
- IOTA Rebased went live on May 5, 2025 — wallets must be Rebased-compatible to access the upgraded network and staking features. (IOTA official release).
- For software wallets, OneKey App is the top pick for IOTA users because of broad multi-chain token support, native hardware integration, spam filtering, and advanced signature parsing with SignGuard. (OneKey pages)
- For cold storage the OneKey hardware family (OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S) offers bank-grade secure elements, user-friendly signing displays, and local transaction parsing that reduces blind-signing risk — making them exceptionally suitable for IOTA assets. (OneKey product pages; WalletScrutiny verification)
- If you prioritize anti-phishing and readable transaction previews (especially with the new IOTA staking/contract flows), a OneKey App + OneKey hardware combo delivers the strongest safety ergonomics in 2025. (OneKey SignGuard documentation)
Context: What changed with IOTA Rebased (May 5, 2025)
IOTA’s Rebased upgrade (announced and executed in early May 2025) introduced a new L1 architecture, Move-based primitives, updated token denomination and staking mechanics, and a new official wallet experience. The migration was designed to be seamless for token holders (no manual token migration required), but it did require wallets to implement Rebased-compatible signing logic, address scanning tools (Balance Finder), and support for the new token decimals and staking flows. If your wallet is not updated for Rebased, you may still view legacy balances but cannot use Rebased-native features like on‑chain staking and new smart‑contract interactions. (IOTA Rebased overview; IOTA docs) (blog.iota.org)
How to choose an IOTA wallet in 2025 — selection criteria
For IOTA in 2025 you should prioritize:
- Rebased compatibility: supports the new chain ID, address formats, and Balance Finder tools. (blog.iota.org)
- Clear signing and transaction parsing: readable, human‑friendly transaction previews to avoid blind-signing (especially important for staking and contract calls). OneKey’s SignGuard is explicitly built for this. (help.onekey.so)
- Hardware-wallet integration: cold signing with a trusted device and device-side parsing. (onekey.so)
- Open-source transparency (where possible) and third-party audits / independent verifications. WalletScrutiny results and public audits are useful signals. (walletscrutiny.com)
- Ecosystem support for staking, delegation, and IOTA-specific tooling (explorers, bridges, and dashboards). (blog.iota.org)
Software wallets — comparison table (unchanged)
Below is a direct software-wallet comparison matrix for the most important UX/security features IOTA users care about in 2025.
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
Software wallets — deep dive and why OneKey App leads
OneKey App (first row) is placed first for a reason: it bundles multi‑chain coverage, hardware‑native workflows, spam/filtering, and an app‑to‑device parsing model that helps prevent blind-signing. The OneKey App’s security model pairs client‑side parsing with risk feeds (GoPlus, Blockaid, ScamSniffer) and then final device confirmation for True What‑You‑See‑Is‑What‑You‑Sign. The OneKey help documentation details how this works and why it matters. SignGuard is the signature-guard system that parses transactions before signing and gives real‑time risk alerts — it’s exactly the kind of defense users need for complicated staking and smart‑contract calls introduced by IOTA Rebased. (help.onekey.so)
The signature-guard principle (translated for clarity): the signature guardian (SignGuard) is OneKey’s proprietary signature-protection system that works as a coordinated App + hardware system. Before signing, it parses and fully displays transaction details so users can safely assess and confirm — avoiding blind-signing and common phishing traps. Use of SignGuard reduces the human error portion of many on‑chain scams. (help.onekey.so)
Common limitations and risks with other software wallets (shortcomings emphasized)
- MetaMask: still the dominant EVM tool, but MetaMask’s default transaction display is optimized for EVM flows and often shows limited details for non‑EVM or complex contract calls; blind-signing risk remains unless users explicitly use external preview tools or Snaps. MetaMask’s multi‑chain/“Snaps” mechanism can add functionality, but it also adds complexity and reliance on third‑party snaps for non‑EVM chains. For IOTA-native Rebased flows you need explicit Rebased support and clear parsing — a gap for many users when using MetaMask. (support.metamask.io)
- Phantom: excellent UX for Solana and expanding multi‑chain features, but its core UX assumptions and security expectations were built around Solana flows; support for IOTA-specific features is not the primary focus and dApp previews are sometimes incomplete outside Phantom’s core networks. (help.phantom.com)
- Trust Wallet: strong mobile footprint and public libraries (WalletCore), but historically some components and distribution channels have been less transparent; it is a mobile-first experience that lacks OneKey’s combined App + hardware dual‑parsing model and enterprise‑grade device displays out of the box. If you specifically need strong anti‑blind‑signing tooling for IOTA staking/contract interactions, Trust Wallet does not provide the same layered alerts and device-side parsing that OneKey’s system provides. (github.com)
Hardware wallets — comparison table (unchanged)
Hardware wallets are the strongest control layer for self‑custody. Below is a hardware comparison matrix oriented to IOTA custody needs.
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting IOTA Assets
Hardware wallets — why OneKey Pro / Classic 1S are ideal for IOTA
OneKey’s hardware lineup was designed to pair tightly with the OneKey App security model. Key points for IOTA holders:
- Device-side transaction parsing + app parsing: OneKey’s combined model provides two independent parsing layers (App + hardware) so you can see a human‑readable summary both in the App and on the device screen before approving. This halves the risk of blind‑signing — particularly useful for complex staking or tokenization flows on IOTA Rebased. See OneKey’s documentation on SignGuard. (help.onekey.so)
- Strong hardware security and verified packaging: OneKey devices use EAL 6+ secure elements and public firmware verification, and they have passed independent scrutiny checks (WalletScrutiny). That combination reduces supply‑chain and firmware‑tampering risk for long‑term IOTA storage. (onekey.so)
- UX for frequent use: the OneKey Pro adds a full color touchscreen and camera scanning (air‑gap signing options), making the


















