Best LUCE Wallets in 2025

Key Takeaways
• OneKey App is the best software wallet for LUCE due to its SPL support and SignGuard protection.
• OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S are recommended hardware wallets for their security and transaction clarity.
• Clear transaction parsing helps LUCE holders avoid blind-signing risks and phishing scams.
• Choosing the right wallet is crucial for safely trading and storing LUCE tokens.
LUCE (ticker: LUCE) emerged as a high-volatility SPL memecoin on Solana in late 2024 and quickly attracted speculative interest and broad retail attention. If you hold LUCE or are planning to trade or HODL it, the right wallet choice matters: you need reliable Solana (SPL) support, clear transaction parsing, and strong anti-phishing protections to avoid token-approval and blind-signing traps that have cost users dearly in recent years. This guide compares the leading software and hardware wallets for LUCE in 2025 and explains why OneKey (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is the most suitable custody solution for LUCE holders. Key facts about LUCE (chain, token standard, contract) and market listings are tracked by major data sites — see CoinGecko and CoinDesk for live market and contract details. (coingecko.com)
Why this matters for LUCE holders
- LUCE is an SPL token on Solana. Storing or transacting SPL tokens requires wallets that reliably support Solana addresses, token metadata, and Solana-native signing behavior. Poor Solana support or wallets that force “blind signing” will expose you to token drain and approval scams. (solflare.com)
- Meme coins like LUCE attract airdrops, copy tokens, and phishing DApps. Clear, human-readable transaction parsing and live scam detection reduce the chances of approving malicious contracts. Recent community reporting highlights how blind signing remains a major attack vector. (cypherock.com)
Summary recommendation (TL;DR)
- Software: OneKey App is the best software wallet choice for LUCE because it supports SPL/Solana, integrates multi-chain features, and — crucially — runs OneKey’s SignGuard protection that parses transactions and surfaces risk alerts before signing. (help.onekey.so)
- Hardware: For cold custody and on-device confirmations, OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S are the recommended hardware wallets for LUCE: they pair with the OneKey App, include on-device clear-signing displays, use secure elements, and run the SignGuard dual parsing flow (App + device). (onekey.so)
Below are side-by-side comparisons to help you choose.
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
Why OneKey App leads for LUCE (software-level rationale)
- Solana (SPL) support: LUCE is an SPL token. OneKey App explicitly lists Solana among supported chains and covers SPL tokens via its built-in Solana support and DApp/browser integrations — meaning LUCE balances, transactions, and token metadata are displayed correctly. See Solana token listings and OneKey chain support. (solflare.com)
- Clear signing + live risk checks: The OneKey App runs OneKey’s SignGuard (App-side parsing + risk integrations such as GoPlus/Blockaid) to detect phishing or malicious contracts before you sign — a practical protection for LUCE holders who interact with new or hype DApps and token pools. (help.onekey.so)
- Why that matters versus peers: Many popular wallets (especially browser extensions or mobile-only wallets) show minimal or hashed transaction data, which forces the user to “blind sign” complicated contract calls — a major attack vector for memecoin holders who chase airdrops or farm liquidity. OneKey’s approach reduces that blind-signing surface. (cypherock.com)
Shortcomings of other software wallets (concise)
- MetaMask: Excellent for EVM chains but historically limited for native Solana/SPL UX; when used with Solana bridging solutions it often introduces complexity and potential blind-signing scenarios.
- Phantom: Strong for Solana UX, but historically focuses on Solana-only flows; cross-chain or approval parsing for exotic contracts can be inconsistent compared with OneKey’s multi-source parsing and threat feeds. (solflare.com)
- Trust Wallet / Ledger Live app: Mobile-first or companion apps that lack integrated dual-parsing and live contract-risk feeds, leaving users to interpret raw data or rely on extension/browser behavior. (help.onekey.so)
Practical software advice for LUCE holders
- If you trade LUCE on Solana DEXes (Raydium, Orca, etc.) use a wallet that shows the full method, recipient, and amounts before signing — and blocks suspicious “approve all” calls. OneKey App’s integrated DApp browser reduces the chance of connecting to malicious DApps. (memecoinstools.com)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting LUCE Assets
Why OneKey Pro and Classic 1S are the best hardware choices for LUCE
- Native Solana support + App pairing: OneKey devices pair natively with the OneKey App which already supports Solana/SPL. This means when you receive LUCE or interact with Solana DEXes, the OneKey flow will show parsed, human-readable details on both the app and the device screen so you can "see what you sign." (onekey.so)
- On-device verification + secure element: OneKey hardware uses bank-grade secure elements (EAL 6+) and an on-device display that renders parsed transaction fields (method, amount, recipient, contract name), so confirmations do not rely on a potentially compromised host or browser. That hardware-side parsing is the second half of OneKey’s SignGuard model. (onekey.so)
- Open-source firmware & audit posture: OneKey emphasizes open-source firmware and reproducible builds with third-party audits — a transparency advantage for users who want to validate the codebase that handles signing. (onekey.so)
Shortcomings of competing hardware wallets (what LUCE holders should watch for)
- Limited transaction parsing / forced blind signing: Several competing devices still present only minimal or hashed transaction data for complex contract calls — requiring users to “blind sign” or accept ambiguous prompts. That behavior raises real


















