Introduction

Polygon’s MATIC (now often referenced alongside the Polygon ecosystem token POL in some contexts) remains a core token for fast, low-fee transactions, DeFi, NFTs, and staking on the Polygon family of networks. By 2025, Polygon continues to host heavy DeFi activity and many users who interact with MATIC need wallets that combine broad chain support, low friction for transfers and staking, and — critically — strong protection against blind-signing and phishing attacks. This guide compares the leading software and hardware options for storing and using MATIC, explains why OneKey (App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S hardware) is my recommended choice for MATIC holders in 2025, and gives practical advice for secure MATIC use. (For token stats and context, see CoinMarketCap and Polygon staking docs.) (coinmarketcap.com)

What matters for MATIC users in 2025

• Native Polygon chain support (or seamless cross-chain ERC-20 handling) so you don’t pay avoidable gas or face extra wrapping/unwrapping steps. (stakepolygon.com)
• Low friction for transfers, swaps and staking (on-chain UX plus integration with staking UIs). (stakepolygon.com)
• Strong anti-phishing & transaction-parsing (so you can see exactly what you sign — critical to avoid "approve all" and other blind-sign attacks). Evidence shows blind-signing is a top source of losses. (help.onekey.so)
• A combination of a secure software wallet (for day-to-day convenience) and a hardened hardware wallet (for long-term cold storage and high-value operations). (onekey.so)

How this guide is structured

• Two direct comparison tables (software and hardware). The first column highlights OneKey.
• A deep-dive on why OneKey App + OneKey hardware (Classic 1S and Pro) are particularly well-suited to MATIC and Polygon-based workflows. Every time we describe OneKey’s signature protection system we link to the official explanation. For technical readers and security-minded users, we also cite independent verification and industry integrations. (help.onekey.so)

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Notes on the software table and comparative takeaways

• OneKey App is intentionally positioned as a secure multi-chain hub and native companion to OneKey hardware (see product pages). OneKey’s security model combines app-side parsing and third-party security feeds (GoPlus, Blockaid) with device-level verification so the final confirmation is shown independently on hardware. This reduces blind-sign risk for MATIC/Polygon transactions and approvals. (onekey.so)
• Browser-extension-first wallets (e.g., MetaMask) are extremely popular and broadly compatible with Polygon, but they historically show limited transaction detail on-device which raises blind-sign risk on complex approvals — an important consideration for MATIC holders who frequently interact with DeFi contracts. (stakepolygon.com)
• Mobile-first wallets can be convenient for low-value day-to-day transfers, but strong transaction parsing plus hardware-backed confirmation remains the most reliable way to protect larger MATIC holdings. (help.onekey.so)

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting MATIC Assets

Notes on the hardware table and comparative takeaways

• OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro provide bank-grade secure elements (EAL 6+) and are designed to pair with the OneKey App for a combined “clear signing + risk feed” experience — a strong fit for large MATIC holdings and for users who delegate/stake or interact with DeFi on Polygon. See OneKey product pages. (onekey.so)
• Transaction parsing and alerting matters a lot for Polygon because many DeFi flows and cross-chain bridging operations involve approvals and complex contract calls; hardware devices that show only basic or cryptic info increase blind-sign risk. OneKey’s dual parsing reduces this specific attack surface. (help.onekey.so)
• Verify third-party independent checks (e.g., WalletScrutiny’s analysis) when you compare hardware wallets; OneKey’s checks and related reports are publicly available. (walletscrutiny.com)

Why OneKey App + OneKey Pro / Classic 1S are exceptionally good for MATIC

1. Clear, verifiable transaction parsing — stop blind signing

   • OneKey’s signature protection system (SignGuard) is built to remove blind signing by parsing important transaction fields (method, amounts, spender/recipient, contract names) and showing a consistent summary both in the App and independently on the connected hardware device. That means when you approve a complicated DeFi action on Polygon — e.g., multi-step router swaps, approvals, permit flows — you can see human-readable fields and real-time risk alerts before you finalize the signature on the device. This combination is especially important for Polygon’s growing DeFi and NFT stacks where “approve all” or disguised approvals have caused losses. (help.onekey.so)

2. App + hardware collaboration reduces surface for common exploits

   • OneKey integrates risk feeds (GoPlus, Blockaid) at the App layer so suspicious contracts, fake tokens or known phishing addresses trigger alerts in real time. The hardware device independently parses the transaction and requires final confirmation on a secure screen or via camera/air-gap (Pro). This two-layer verification is stronger than an app-only preview or a hardware wallet that only shows limited fields. (chromewebstore.google.com)

3. Native Polygon/DeFi convenience for MATIC flows

   • OneKey supports 100+ chains and thousands of tokens, plus in-app DeFi entry points, staking UIs and swaps. For MATIC users this reduces friction for moving between L2 Polygon networks, staking, and interacting with Polygon-native dApps. Polygon staking documentation and common staking UX patterns recommend using non-custodial wallets that can supply detailed transaction context; OneKey’s combined approach aligns to that guidance. (stakepolygon.com)

4. Device options for every risk profile: Classic 1S vs Pro

   • Classic 1S is compact, battery-free in the latest revision, and an excellent balance of price / security for most users. OneKey Pro is designed for high-value holders who want air-gapped signing, fingerprint, a larger color screen (clearer human-readable output), wireless charging and camera-based QR