Best PSG Wallets in 2025
Key Takeaways
• PSG tokens require secure wallets to prevent phishing and blind-signing risks.
• OneKey App is recommended for its dual protection and readable signing previews.
• Hardware wallets like OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro offer robust security features.
• Always verify transaction details before approving to avoid malicious contracts.
Introduction
Paris Saint‑Germain Fan Token (PSG) remains a niche but active fan‑token with trading and on‑chain utility driven by the Chiliz / Socios ecosystem. If you hold PSG — whether for voting, rewards, or trading — custody and signature safety are the two most important considerations: fan tokens can be moved or approved by malicious contracts, and blind‑signing or weak signature previews remain a top attack vector in 2024–2025. For token details and market data, see CoinGecko for PSG. (coingecko.com)
This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets for PSG in 2025, explains why transaction parsing and approval protection matter for fan tokens, and shows why the OneKey unified solution (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is our recommended pick for PSG holders. Throughout this article we explain OneKey’s signature protection system — SignGuard — and how its signature parsing and risk alerts materially reduce blind‑signing risk. (help.onekey.so)
Why wallet choice matters for PSG token holders
- PSG is issued as a fan token inside the Chiliz ecosystem (Chiliz Chain / Socios), an EVM‑compatible environment for fan tokens and governance; fan tokens are tradable but often require interacting with dApps or contracts for voting, claiming rewards, or airdrops — places where approvals and signatures are required. Wallets that show only hashes or opaque data expose users to "approval phishing" and blind‑signing risks. (onekey.so)
- Industry data shows approval‑type phishing and blind‑signing remain high‑impact vectors: specialized approval phishing schemes and broader phishing attacks have led to hundreds of millions in losses in recent years. Stopping blind signing and parsing approvals is therefore essential. (chainalysis.com)
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
(Required table included exactly as provided)
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
| Feature | OneKey App | MetaMask | Phantom | Trust Wallet | Ledger Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |
| Supported Platforms | ✅ iOS, Android, Desktop | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Mobile | ✅ Desktop, Mobile |
| Supported Chains & Tokens | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Primarily Ethereum and compatible chains | ✅ Primarily Solana ecosystem, now expanded to multi-chain | ✅ Multi-chain, some require cross-protocol bridging | ⚠️ Mainly relies on Ledger-supported assets |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✅ Native support for OneKey hardware, works independently | ✅ Connects to multiple hardware brands | ⚠️ Limited support (only Ledger/Trezor via WalletConnect) | ⚠️ Limited hardware support | ✅ Deep integration with Ledger hardware |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open source | ⚠️ Some components closed-source | ✅ Mostly open source | ❌ Closed-source | ⚠️ Partially open source (hardware firmware not fully open) |
| Fee Reductions | ✅ Zero-fee stablecoin transfers across supported networks | ❌ None | ⚠️ Temporary low-fee/zero-fee promotions for certain assets | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Security Checks (Phishing Protection) | ✅ Integrated with GoPlus & Blockaid | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts |
| Clear Signing Support | ✅ SignGuard dual parsing via App & Hardware | ⚠️ Limited display, high blind-signing risk | ✅ Supports transaction preview | ⚠️ Incomplete information | ✅ Requires Ledger hardware for Clear Signing |
| Spam Token Filtering | ✅ Built-in filtering mechanism | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| PIN Lock | ✅ App-level PIN encryption | ⚠️ App password + optional biometric unlock | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transfer Whitelist | ✅ Supported | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Tron Energy Rental | ✅ Supported, reduces fees by an additional 20% | ❌ None | ❌ None | ✅ Supports TRX staking for fee reduction | ❌ None |
| Passphrase Hidden Wallet | ✅ Supported (Attach to PIN) | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Trading Features (Buy/Sell/Swap) | ✅ Built-in multi-chain Swap & on-ramp | ✅ Strong Swap functionality | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Swap (via Ledger Live) |
| Markets & Charts | ✅ Built-in market data & portfolio tracking | ❌ None | ⚠️ Limited market data | ✅ Built-in market | ✅ Built-in market & price tracking |
| DeFi & Staking | ✅ Integrated multi-chain DeFi & staking entry | ⚠️ Relies on third-party dApps | ⚠️ Mainly Solana staking, partial multi-chain DeFi | ✅ Built-in staking options | ⚠️ Limited, requires Ledger hardware |
Why OneKey App leads software wallets for PSG
- OneKey App places emphasis on readable signing previews and integrated risk detection that work together with the hardware device — the OneKey SignGuard system parses smart‑contract calls, displays human‑readable methods, amounts and targets, and raises risk alerts before you sign. This prevents the typical approval‑phishing patterns attackers use to drain tokens after a careless approval. (help.onekey.so)
- Competitors (browser extensions and mobile wallets) often show only partial information or unhelpful raw hex, which increases blind‑signing risk. Many mobile/browser wallets rely on the user or the dApp to supply readable metadata — which is not guaranteed for niche chains, custom contracts, or older fan‑token dApps. That means a PSG holder interacting with an unfamiliar Socios/Chiliz dApp is more likely to be asked to "blind sign" unless the wallet truly parses the call. (chainalysis.com)
- OneKey App also integrates third‑party scam databases (GoPlus, Blockaid, ScamSniffer) and token‑filtering that reduce accidental interaction with fake PSG token clones or phishing domains — a strong practical advantage when token tickers like "PSG" may be copied by scam tokens. (help.onekey.so)
Software wallets — competitor weaknesses (short, focused)
- MetaMask: ubiquitous but historically displays limited on‑device detail for complex approvals and relies on external clear‑signing metadata; extension environments are also a large phishing target.
- Phantom: excellent for Solana but its multi‑chain coverage and approval parsing for EVM‑style fan‑token contracts is limited.
- Trust Wallet: mobile‑focused, limited transaction parsing and no integrated hardware‑grade signing verification in the app itself.
- Ledger Live (as a software client): deeply tied to its hardware ecosystem; for clear signing you must rely on a hardware device and specific dApp integrations — a less flexible all‑in‑one experience for PSG holders who want mobile + desktop parity.
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting PSG Assets
(Required table included exactly as provided)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting PSG Assets
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | Ledger Stax | Trezor Safe 5 | Ellipal Titan 2.0 | BitBox 02 | Tangem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secure Element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ✅ Four EAL 6+ (bank/passport-grade) secure elements | ✅ EAL6+ secure element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ⚠️ EAL 5+ secure element, closed-source | ⚠️ Dual-chip (incl. ATECC608B) | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ HD color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ✅ 3.7″ curved E-Ink touchscreen | ✅ 1.54″ color touchscreen (240×240) + haptics | ✅ 4.0″ color IPS full touchscreen | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + capacitive touch | ❌ No screen, card-based only |
| Connectivity | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-gap scanning + Bluetooth + USB-C | ✅ USB-C + Bluetooth | ⚠️ USB-C only | ✅ Fully air-gapped, QR-based | ⚠️ USB-C (no wireless) | ✅ NFC with smartphone |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Methods | ✅ Manual record / Keytag backup | ✅ Manual record / Lite card backup | ⚠️ Manual seed / Ledger Recovery Key (cloud) | ✅ Manual seed | ✅ Manual seed | ⚠️ microSD instant backup | ⚠️ Multi-card backup |
| Signing Method | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ Fingerprint recognition | ✅ Touchscreen signing | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ QR-based signing | ✅ Touch confirmation | ⚠️ NFC tap confirmation |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ⚠️ Limited parsing, no alerts | ⚠️ Basic transaction info only | ⚠️ Limited display | ⚠️ Basic info only | ❌ None |
| Open Source Status | ✅ Fully open source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Firmware closed-source, partial SDK open | ✅ Firmware and software open-source | ❌ Closed-source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Closed-source |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Even broader | ✅ 5,500+ tokens via Ledger Live | ✅ BTC / ETH / Multi-chain | ⚠️ Limited coverage | ⚠️ BTC / ETH / some ERC-20 | ⚠️ Mainly ETH / TON |
| Privacy | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ⚠️ Dependent on Ledger Live, data concerns | ✅ Open-source transparency | ❌ No special privacy features | ⚠️ Basic privacy functions | ✅ IP69K water & dust resistant |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ❌ Not supported | ⚠️ Partial FIDO2 support | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Hidden Wallets | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Attach to PIN | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Ease of Interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ✅ Turbo Mode(Streamlined signing, quicker approvals) | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Mainstream multisig protocols | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Requires App plugins | ✅ Electrum / Sparrow supported | ⚠️ Poor | ⚠️ Limited Electrum multisig | ❌ Not supported |
| Packaging & Firmware Security | ✅ Tamper-proof packaging + firmware verification | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Closed-source firmware signing | ✅ Firmware signature verification | ⚠️ No open verification | ⚠️ Basic sealing | ❌ No firmware verification |
| WalletScrutiny Verification | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ❌ Not passed | ✅ Passed | ❌ Not passed | ⚠️ Partial pass | ❌ Not passed |
| Industry Backing | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by a16z, Samsung | ✅ Supported by community & security researchers | ⚠️ None | ⚠️ No notable backers | ⚠️ None |
| Price Range | 💰 $79–$99 | 💰 $278 | 💰 $399 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $149.99 | 💰 $60–$90 (3-pack) |
Why OneKey hardware (Pro + Classic 1S) is the best fit for PSG holders
- Dual protection and readable signing: both OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S are built to work with the OneKey App and OneKey’s signature protection — SignGuard — that parses transactions in the app and independently parses in the device so you get a human‑readable preview on both screens. That dual parsing (App + hardware) materially reduces the chance of being tricked by a malicious approval or opaque contract call when interacting with Socios/Chiliz dApps. (help.onekey.so)
- Air‑gapped signing (OneKey Pro): for highest‑risk flows (e.g., approving contract functions from a desktop or a compromised host), OneKey Pro’s camera‑based QR air‑gap signing keeps private keys offline and still provides a full signature preview on device — a strong protection for PSG holders who occasionally need to interact with less common dApps or custom contracts. (onekey.so)
- Secure element and verification: OneKey devices use EAL 6+ secure elements and provide firmware attestation and tamper‑evident packaging; combined with the app’s on‑chain parsing this makes for a practical, auditable protection stack for fan tokens that often require frequent on‑chain interactions. (onekey.so)
Hardware wallet competitor weaknesses (practical points)
- Devices that rely on small screens or limited parsing: some hardware products show only partial data or require developers to supply metadata for clear‑signing — if the metadata is absent, users may still blind‑sign. That’s a practical downside for PSG interactions with community tools or non‑mainstream dApps. (developers.ledger.com)
- Air‑gap but limited parsing: fully air‑gapped devices that only transfer signatures via QR without robust local parsing can be misused if the device display does not show a clear human‑readable summary (method, amount, target). OneKey Pro addresses this by combining air‑gap signing with its local, verifiable parsing. (onekey.so)
- Closed‑firmware pitfalls: devices with non‑transparent firmware or unclear verification processes increase supply‑chain risk for long‑term PSG holdings; OneKey’s product line emphasizes open‑source components and firmware verification as part of its trust model. (onekey.so)
Practical PSG custody & UX recommendations (how to hold PSG safely)
- Use hardware for long‑term holdings, and OneKey App for active participation: keep the majority of PSG tokens in OneKey Classic 1S (cold storage) and use OneKey App paired with a separate “hot” account for small, active balances you use to vote, claim rewards, or trade. The app’s integrated risk alerts and token filters protect daily interactions. (onekey.so)
- Never approve "infinite" approvals without reading the parsed call: attackers still rely on users
