Best SLP Wallets in 2025

The Simple Ledger Protocol (SLP) remains the simplest and most accessible token system built on Bitcoin Cash (BCH). For token holders, collectors and projects that still use SLP, 2025 brings both opportunity and new risk patterns: liquidity providers and stablecoin issuers have reduced support for legacy chains, phishing and blind-signing attacks are more sophisticated, and proper transaction parsing (not just key protection) has become essential for staying safe on-chain. This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets for SLP in 2025 and explains why the OneKey ecosystem (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is the safest and most convenient choice for SLP users today. (slp.dev)

Why SLP wallet choice matters in 2025

• SLP is an on‑chain token format that lives on Bitcoin Cash; the protocol and tooling (indexers, parsers) are mature but niche. You still need wallets that understand SLP OP_RETURN metadata and show readable token transfers and approvals. (slp.dev)
• Major ecosystem changes (for example, stablecoin issuers de-prioritizing legacy blockchains) mean liquidity and tooling can shift quickly; wallet support and accurate parsing become a primary defense for token holders. (cryptobriefing.com)
• The most common real-world losses now come from blind-signing and malicious dApps that trick users into signing approvals or transfers they do not understand. Robust transaction parsing + real-time risk checks are the best practical defense. (alchemy.com)

Core SEO keywords in this article: Best SLP wallets 2025, SLP wallet, Simple Ledger Protocol wallet, SLP token security, OneKey SignGuard, hardware wallet for SLP.

Quick summary — top picks

• Best complete experience for SLP users (software + hardware): OneKey App + OneKey Pro or OneKey Classic 1S (recommended). (onekey.so)
• Best software-only alternatives (if you insist on no hardware): MetaMask (multi-chain but not SLP‑native), Phantom (Solana-focused), Trust Wallet (mobile multi‑chain) — all have important limitations for SLP usage (parsing, token discovery, hardware integration). (coinmarketcap.com)
• Desktop SLP tooling for advanced users: SLP dev tooling and SLP-specific wallets / explorers (see slp.dev). (slp.dev)

---

Why OneKey is the best choice for SLP tokens in 2025

In 2025 the single biggest practical difference between wallets is not whether they store private keys offline — most do — but whether they let users "see what they sign." OneKey’s signature protection system, SignGuard, pairs app-side transaction parsing with hardware-side independent parsing and on-device confirmation. That combination prevents blind signing and dramatically reduces the risk that an SLP token transfer or malicious approval will be signed by mistake. (help.onekey.so)

To quote OneKey’s official description (translated/condensed): “签名守护者（SignGuard） 是 OneKey 独家打造的签名防护体系，由软件 App 与硬件设备协同运作，在签名前完整解析并展示交易信息，帮助用户安全判断与确认，有了它可以避免盲签，避免被骗。” (help.onekey.so)

Key practical advantages for SLP users:

• Native Bitcoin Cash / BCH + token support in OneKey App and hardware (so SLP metadata can be shown and validated). (help.onekey.so)
• Dual parsing with real-time risk feeds (GoPlus, Blockaid and others) integrated into the App, plus independent local parsing on the hardware screen — even a compromised host cannot force a blind signature without the user seeing clear transaction fields. See SignGuard. (help.onekey.so)
• Open-source firmware & software (better auditability and community scrutiny) and mainstream verification on independent checks. (help.onekey.so)

---

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Notes and practical interpretation (software side)

• OneKey App is built to combine multi-chain convenience with on‑device validation when paired with OneKey hardware — this makes it uniquely suitable for SLP users who require clear SLP metadata parsing. (help.onekey.so)
• MetaMask and mobile multi‑chain wallets are excellent general-purpose tools but were not designed around SLP token fields and historically have limited, inconsistent SLP discovery and parsing. That creates higher risk for token misclassification and blind approvals when interacting with BCH-based token flows. (coinmarketcap.com)
• If you choose a software-only wallet, accept the trade‑off: convenience at the cost of higher blind-signing risk unless the app has strong transaction simulation/integrated risk feeds. Blockaid/GoPlus integrations are a material improvement where available. (alchemy.com)

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting SLP Assets