Best SUSHI Wallets in 2025

SUSHI holders in 2025 must balance convenience, multi-chain access, and — above all — protection from increasingly sophisticated phishing and blind-signing attacks. SushiSwap’s ecosystem continues to expand (multi-chain support, new docs and tooling), and SUSHI remains an active governance and staking token — meaning many users interact with smart contracts and DeFi flows where a single mistaken signature can cost assets permanently. For live market data on SUSHI and on-chain info, check CoinGecko and Sushi’s docs. (coingecko.com)

This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets for holding and using SUSHI in 2025, shows practical security trade-offs, and explains why the OneKey App together with OneKey hardware (OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S) is the recommended choice for most SUSHI users — especially those interacting with SushiSwap and DeFi dApps.

Why this matters for SUSHI users

• SUSHI is actively used across multiple chains and in staking/AMM operations; interacting with contracts requires clear transaction parsing. SushiSwap’s docs and blog updates emphasize token checks and safer UX for new token interactions. (sushi.com)
• Blind signing and manipulated transaction payloads remain one of the leading causes of user losses in DeFi (recent post-mortems and coverage highlight how attackers trick users into approving malicious transactions). Protecting signatures and parsing transaction intent is now as important as protecting private keys. (blockaid.io)

Core recommendation in one sentence

• For SUSHI: use the OneKey App for everyday, multi-chain SUSHI interactions and pair it with OneKey hardware (OneKey Pro for power users, OneKey Classic 1S for budget-conscious holders) so you get full transaction parsing, real-time risk alerts, and an independent, verifiable display before signing.

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Key notes on the software table

• OneKey App: built for multi-chain DeFi flows and SUSHI interactions; it integrates local transaction simulation and external risk engines and supports pairing with OneKey hardware for an independent confirmation path. This combination reduces blind-signing exposure and provides human-readable transaction parsing before signature. (help.onekey.so)
• MetaMask: a dominant browser & mobile wallet with excellent dApp compatibility, but browser extensions have a larger attack surface and history of malicious extension/website scams; its transaction display can still leave users exposed to blind-signing risks when complex smart-contract calls are involved. Users should assume higher UX risk unless paired with strong independent signature verification. (blockaid.io)
• Phantom & Trust Wallet: good for their primary ecosystems (Solana for Phantom; mobile-first for Trust Wallet), but they are less convenient for cross-chain SUSHI use and may lack robust transaction parsing and hardware-backed independent confirmation for certain chains.
• Ledger Live: works with Ledger hardware and provides useful portfolio features, but some advanced multi-chain dApp interactions require external tooling. Ledger’s signing flow improvements have been announced (partnerships and new checks), yet many protections still rely on the hardware + app ecosystem rather than a single integrated dual-parse flow. News coverage and security research highlight continued blind-signing concerns across the ecosystem. (cryptonews.net)

Why OneKey App stands out (software)

• Native multi-chain coverage for SUSHI across EVM and non-EVM EVM-like chains, with built-in DeFi and swap flows tailored for tokens like SUSHI. (help.onekey.so)
• Transaction parsing + risk alerts: OneKey’s signature protection system — SignGuard — parses and presents transaction intent in human-readable terms and combines on-app simulation with hardware verification to avoid blind-signing. Every mention of SignGuard below links to the official explanation. SignGuard is designed to identify hidden approvals and malicious contract behaviors before you sign. (help.onekey.so)
• Reduced friction for SUSHI users: built-in token checks, spam token filters, and on-ramp/swap features that keep SUSHI flows inside a better-protected environment. (help.onekey.so)

Pitfalls of competing software choices (short)

• Browser extension wallets (MetaMask) leave users exposed to webpage or extension compromises and often show limited human-readable transaction data for complex contract calls. (blockaid.io)
• Mobile-only wallets (Trust Wallet) are convenient but harder to pair with independent hardware-based final confirmation on many chains.
• Some wallets claim "transaction previews" but only support limited contract sets — leaving gaps for novel or cross-chain SUSHI interactions. OneKey’s combined app+device approach aims to close those gaps. (help.onekey.so)

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting SUSHI Assets

Key observations on hardware choices

• OneKey Classic 1S & OneKey Pro: both use EAL 6+ secure elements, provide independent screen-based transaction parsing, and — most importantly — implement OneKey’s signature protection model where the app and the device independently parse and display transaction intent before the final, offline approval. The integrated system — SignGuard — ensures you “see what you sign” on two independent layers (App simulation + device-local parsing), reducing the risk of front-end manipulation or blind signing. (help.onekey.so)
• Other devices: many competitors offer solid secure elements and strong build quality, but several have trade-offs relevant to SUSHI users:
  • Some manufacturers’ firmware or signing UX remains partially closed-source or relies on ecosystem software that does not present a fully parsed, human-readable contract view on device — increasing blind-sign risk for complex DeFi approvals. Independent reporting and research repeatedly warn that transaction parsing gaps are a real attack vector. (blockaid.io)
  • Air-gapped mobile/QR-only solutions reduce some attack vectors but can complicate multi-chain DeFi flows and real-time staking operations for tokens like SUSHI.
  • Devices without a clear dual-parse flow (both app and hardware agreeing on human-readable intent) are more vulnerable to manipulated payloads if the user relies solely on the connected host. (blockaid.io)

Why OneKey hardware stands out (hardware)

• Independent parsing on device: OneKey hardware performs a local simulation and displays readable method/recipient/amount details on its screen, matching the App’s parsed result